82. Minister Nalbandian delivered a speech at the UN Human Rights Council 05.03.2014 (2)

STATEMENT BY

 

H.E. Mr. EDWARD NALBANDIAN

 

MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA

 

at the High Level Segment of the

United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva

 

Tuesday, 4 March 2014

 

 

 

Mr. President,

Excellencies,

Ladies and Gentlemen,

 

I would like to join previous speakers in congratulating Mr. Baudelaire Ndong Ella on his election as the President of the Human Rights Council, and to wish him success in this important endeavor.

In today’s world, where human rights are praised more than ever, and at the same time violated not less than in the past, in this Palace of Nations the words of one of the world’s most dedicated personalities to human rights Nelson Mandela is more than relevant: “to deny people their human rights is to challenge their very humanity.”

 

The Human Rights Council has addressed many questions in attempts to respond to the situations of gross violation of human rights in various parts of the world.

 

It is vital to concentrate on the concept of prevention. The UN Secretary-General’s Five-Year Action Agenda draws special attention to the issue of prevention. Early prevention can surely stop escalation of conflicts, tragedies and crimes against humanity. Implementation of this Agenda allows us to address the issue of prevention at a global level through regular assessment of possible risks.

 

One of such risks leading to the most dangerous consequences is the propaganda of hatred on racial, ethnic or religious ground. This propaganda is often accompanied with aggressive bellicose rhetoric. The South Caucasus region in the past witnessed and now is witnessing this kind of risks. Such propaganda preceded anti-Armenian massacres in Azerbaijan – in Sumgait, Baku, Maragha and many other places, when thousands of Armenians were tortured, killed, thus starting the ethnic cleansing of Armenians living on the territory of Azerbaijan. Twenty five years later, in today’s Azerbaijan, similar, and even worse hate-speech, war propaganda emanating from the highest level of Azerbaijani authorities often results in the escalation of the situation and loss of innocent lives.

 

The European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) in its report on Azerbaijan noted with deep concern the “constant and negative official and media discourse concerning the Republic of Armenia” and recommended the Azerbaijani authorities to “adopt an appropriate response to all cases of discrimination and hate speech against Armenians.” Responsive nature of our organization entails proper assessment and adequate reaction to this behavior.

 

Mr. President,

 

The UN treaty bodies do an important job to monitor human rights situation worldwide and help countries improve their human rights record. We especially appreciate the work of the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, which recently elaborated Recommendation No.35 on racist hate speech. In particular, the Committee underlined the role of hate speech in processes leading to mass violations of human rights in conflict situations and genocide. The Committee members issued the above-mentioned Recommendation being fully aware of the role of hate speech in instigating racial hatred and discrimination, and reflected at length on the dangers it posed.

 

The Universal Periodic Review became a good tool in protection and promotion of human rights. It is a known fact that efficiency of human rights protection international mechanisms depends on the political will and readiness of Member States to implement their commitments by respecting the adopted rules and procedures. Since its launch in 2008, the UPR was meant to focus exclusively on human rights and avoid politicization of the raised issues. During Armenia’s UPR review, the Armenian side accepted the recommendations made by Member States. Azerbaijan during its UPR turned the entire review into a politicized show, selectively interpreting international community’s perception of human rights, refusing to accept any of recommendations made by the Armenian delegation – just because they were “recommended by Armenia”. Such behavior undermines the whole concept and the foundations of the UPR. This was a violation of rules of procedure. I call upon the Member States to strongly react to such cases in order not to create such destructive precedence.

 

Last year Armenia assumed chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. The priorities of the Armenian Chairmanship have been defined in response to the challenges that the world faces today with regard to the protection of human rights, strengthening of democracy and respect for the rule of law. Racism and racial discrimination, xenophobia and intolerance grossly violate human dignity and give rise to tensions within and between societies. That is why the fight against them became one of the main priorities of our chairmanship.

 

Mr. President,

 

We often speak about universality and indivisibility of human rights. All human rights are equally important and must be equally protected. In this context I would like to mention the right of peoples to self-determination. In accordance with the founding purposes of the UN Charter, Article 1 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights recognizes that all peoples have the right to self-determination, which is of particular importance because its realization is an essential prerequisite for the effective guarantee of human rights. This inalienable right unequivocally belongs inter alia to the people of Nagorno-Karabakh.

 

 

82. Minister Nalbandian delivered a speech at the UN Human Rights Council 05.03.2014

Mr. President,

 

Speaking on the situation in Syria that still continues to remain complex and in the centre of attention of international community, I would like to welcome the unanimous adoption by the Security Council of the Resolution that speaks about the urgent need to increase humanitarian aid access in Syria, calling to immediately cease attacks against civilians and lift the siege of populated areas. We welcome all efforts towards the peaceful solution of the crisis. Armenia has already received over 10.000 refugees from Syria, and our Government tries to do its best to assist them.

 

Mr. President,

 

Prevention of genocide and crimes against humanity should be amongst our priorities. Last year, during the 22nd session of the Human Rights Council, Armenia initiated a resolution on Prevention of Genocide, which was adopted by consensus. One of the aims of that Resolution is genocide prevention through joint efforts of the UN Member States. I would like to take this opportunity and thank all those countries that co-sponsored the Resolution. In two days, on March 7th, the Human Rights Council will convene a high-level panel to mark the 65th Anniversary of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. The panel is organized in accordance with the requirements of the said Resolution. I call upon all Member States to actively participate in this important panel discussion.

 

Thank you!

 Անկախ

New York Times corrects article about ’12 Years a Slave’ — 161 years later

12 Years a Slave

It’s a correction more than 160 years in the making.

In its Tuesday edition, The New York Times published a correction for an article that ran on January 20, 1853.

The newspaper has Hollywood and Twitter to thank for bringing the error to light.

The Times explained that the article in question told the story of Solomon Northup, a free African-American man who was kidnapped and sold into slavery.

Northup’s memoir, “12 Years a Slave,” was turned into a movie that won the best picture Oscar at this year’s Academy Awards on Sunday.

The problem was that the 1853 article spelled Northup’s name wrong, in two different ways. It appeared as Northrop in the body of the article and Northrup in the headline.

As the Oscars focused attention on “12 Years a Slave,” a Twitter user unearthed the old article from The Times archives, and it spread quickly on social media.

“The errors came to light on Monday after a Twitter user pointed out the article in The Times archives,” the correction said.

 

 Անկախ

Great Scrawl of China! Special section of ancient wall to be set aside to allow tourists to write graffiti on it

A section of the Great Wall of China has been set aside for graffiti in a bid to save other parts being vandalised by tourists.

Authorities chose a popular stretch of the ancient monument where visitors can scrawl their names in the hope it will stop the spread of graffiti.

A spot on the Mutianyu section in Huairou County, about 43 miles north-east of Beijing, was chosen. It is one of the most popular tourist spots along the wall.

The graffiti section will be set up at one of the fighting towers that has become a common place there for tourists to scrawl on the walls.

It attracts millions of tourists per year, 40 per cent of whom are estimated to be foreigners, which explains why most of the graffiti is in English.

OSCE Sending Military Observer Mission to Ukraine

զինվոր

 

A U.S. official says the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe will send a military observer mission to Ukraine at its request.

Daniel Baer, the chief U.S. representative to the OSCE, said 15 of its nations, including the United States, decided in Vienna on Tuesday to volunteer members for the mission, which Ukraine had asked for. He said it will head to Ukraine as early as Wednesday, with the goal of then traveling to Crimea.

On Saturday, heavily armed pro-Russian forces took over the strategic peninsula in Ukraine, surrounding its ferry, military bases and border posts. Two Ukrainian warships remained anchored in the Crimean port of Sevastopol, blocked from leaving by Russian ships.

The U.S. is preparing economic sanctions against Russia amid worries that Moscow is ready to stretch its military reach further into the mainland of the former Soviet republic.

The OSCE includes Russia, the United States, and all European countries.

 

 Անկախ

Corruption Scandal May End Erdogan’s Political Career

Հարութ Սասունյան

By Harut Sassounian

Publisher, The California Courier

 

In a series of secretly recorded phone conversations revealed last week, Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan was heard instructing his son to hide from police tens of millions of dollars of cash stashed in his Istanbul house.

 

This shocking revelation generated widespread calls for Erdogan’s resignation who claimed that the phone recordings are fake or edited. It appears, however, that the wiretapped conversations between the Prime Minister and his son are authentic, according to Guarded Risk, an American cyber company that conducted a comprehensive forensic analysis of the phone calls.

 

It is ironic that Erdogan who came to power as an Islamist with the declared aim of eliminating corruption from Turkish politics, has fallen victim to the dictum: “power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely!”

 

The phone calls were secretly recorded on the day police raided the homes of several cabinet members, prominent businessmen, and the head of the state bank. They were all accused of involvement in bribery and other corrupt practices.

 

Here is the English translation of excerpts from Erdogan’s five wiretapped conversations with his son, Bilal:

 

First phone call at 8:02 am on Dec. 17, 2013:

 

Erdogan: …Take everything you have out of your house, OK?

Bilal: What would I have, dad? Your money is in the safe.

Erdogan: That’s what I am talking about….

Bilal: What shall we do with it, daddy? Where shall we put it?

Erdogan: In specific places, in some specific places… . Do it!

 

Second call at 11:17 am:

 

Bilal: …My brother [in-law] Berat has another idea. He says we should give some of it to Faruk [Kalyoncu, president of a construction company] for the other job, so he can process them like the previous ones. Shall we do that? We can sort out a big amount of money that way.
Erdogan: Possibly.
Bilal: OK. For the other part, because we started a business partnership with Mehmet Gur [managing director of a construction group], we thought of giving it to him saying, ‘keep it, you can use it as projects come up.’ This way, we can reduce it and move the rest to somewhere else.
Erdogan: OK, fine, as long as you do it…. It would be good if you do… If you can liquidate them all.
Bilal: Yes, we will liquidate them all today, God willing!

 

Third call at 3:39 pm:

 

Erdogan: Did you complete the tasks I gave you?

Bilal: We will finish them by this evening. We sorted some out; We sorted the Berat part, now we will first handle the part with Mehmet Gur, and the rest, we will do after dark….
Erdogan: What did Sumeyye [daughter] do?
Bilal: She took them out, brought them over, we spoke, etc.
Erdogan: Do not speak on the phone with each other.

 

Fourth call at 11:15 pm:

 

Bilal: Hi daddy, I am calling to… we did [it] mostly. Did you call me just now, daddy?

Erdogan: No I did not, you called me.
Bilal: I was called from a secret number.
Erdogan: When you say ‘mostly,’ did you fully liquidate it?
Bilal: It’s not zero yet, daddy. Let me explain. We still have 30 million euros that we could not yet liquidate. Berat has an idea. There was an additional 25 million dollars Ahmet Calik [businessman] should receive. They say let’s give this [to him]. When the money comes, we do [something], they say. And with the remaining money we can buy an apartment from Sehrizar, he says. What do you say, father?
Erdogan: Whatever, we will sort it out.
Bilal: Should we do it like this?
Erdogan: OK, do it.
Bilal: Do you want them all liquidated, father, or do you want some money for yourself?
Erdogan: No, it can’t be left over, son. You could transfer it to the other, with Mehmet you could transfer it there.
Bilal: Yes, we gave it to them. We gave $20 [million] to them.
Erdogan: For God’s sake, first you should have transferred it. Then you could have done it…
Bilal: We were able to give this much for now. It is hard already; it takes too much space. We are putting part of it somewhere else, we gave part of it to Tunc, and then…
Erdogan: Did you transfer all to Tunc?
Bilal: They asked, I guess he said that he could only take 10 million euros.
Erdogan: Whatever! Don’t talk on this [phone].
Bilal: OK, then, we will sort it.
Erdogan: OK, do it. I am not able to come tonight. I’m staying in Ankara.

 

Fifth call at 10:58 am on Dec. 18, 2013:

 

Erdogan: I decided to call to see if there is anything new.

Bilal: No, nothing. We finished the tasks you gave us, with God’s help.
Erdogan: Has it been all liquidated?
Bilal: Completely! How should I put it? I had Samandira and Maltepe’s money, 730,000 US Dollars and 300,000 Turkish Liras. I will handle these too. We owe 1 million Turkish Liras to Faruk İsik [parliament member]; I will give it to him and tell him to transfer the rest to the academy.
Erdogan: Do not speak so openly!
Bilal: Shouldn’t I?
Erdogan: Don’t. OK?
Bilal: OK, daddy
Erdogan: I mean, do not keep anything on your person, whatever it is Samandira or whatever… Send it to where it needs to be, why do you keep it on you?
Bilal: OK, daddy, but I think currently we are under surveillance.
Erdogan: What have I been telling you since the very beginning!
Bilal: But is the security staff following us, father?
Erdogan: Son, you are being wiretapped.
Bilal: But they are also visually monitoring us.
Erdogan: That may be true. Now, we’ve just done some things at the Istanbul police headquarters.

 

Additional recordings have since surfaced in which Erdogan and his son talk about rejecting a $10 million bribe offer from a Turkish businessman for being insufficient.

 

Erdogan could end up losing not only his current position and the chance of becoming President later this year, but may also face prosecution and a lengthy jail term for his alleged crimes.

 

 Անկախ

 

Peugeot’s new ‘posh’ 308 small family hatchback crowned European Car of the Year 2014

Geneva Motor Show

 

Peugeot’s new 308 small family hatchback designed to make the French car-maker more upmarket has been named European Car of the Year.

The crowning of the ‘posh’ Peugeot  was made on the eve of the Geneva Motor Show in Switzerland, where the world’s car makers are gathering.

The Peugeot 308 received a winning 307 points from an international jury of 58 motoring writers – with top points awarded by 22 of them.

The French hatchback beat six other rivals including two electric cars the BMW i3 (with 223 points), the Tesla S (216), Citroen C4 Picasso (182), Mazda3 (180), Skoda Octavia (170), and Mercedes-Benz S-Class.
Built in Sochaux, Peugeot’s historic home in Eastern France, the new 308 was launched in mainland  Europe during the last four months of 2013 and in the UK in January this year, where already more than 4,000 orders have been taken for the car priced from £14,495  to £24,345 .
Production and sales of the 308 in China, the biggest car market in the world, will start early in 2015.
From the start of Spring, the new 308 range will be expanded by the introduction of a second body style: the 308 SW estate.

 

Անկախ